DEFENCE MECHANISM
PSYCHOLOGY
DEFENCE MECHANISM
By
Prof.M. Thanga Darwin
Introduction
Défense mechanisms are
psychological strategies that are unconsciously used to protect a person from
anxiety arising from unacceptable thoughts or feelings.
Sigmund Freud (1894, 1896)
noted a number of ego defences which he refers to throughout his written
works. His daughter Anna (1937)
developed these ideas and elaborated on them, adding five of her own. Many psychoanalysts have also added further
types of ego defences. Because of anxiety provoking demands created by the id,
superego and reality, the ego has developed number of defence mechanisms to
cope with anxiety.
Freud once said, "Life is
not easy!" The ego -- the "I" -- sits at the centre of some
pretty powerful forces: reality; society, as represented by the superego;
biology, as represented by the Id. When these make conflicting demands upon the
poor ego, it is understandable if you feel threatened, fell overwhelmed, feel
as if it were about to collapse under the weight of it all. This feeling is called anxiety, and it serves
as a signal to the ego that its survival, and with it the survival of the whole
organism.
Types of Defence Mechanism
1. Repression:
Forcing a threatening
memory/feeling/wish out of consciousness and making it unconscious. This was the first defence
mechanism that Freud discovered, and arguably the most important. Repression is an unconscious mechanism
employed by the ego to keep disturbing or threatening thoughts from becoming
conscious. Thoughts that are often
repressed are those that would result in feelings of guilt from the
superego. For example, in the Oedipus
complex, aggressive thoughts about the same sex parents are repressed. This is
not a very successful defines in the long term since it involves forcing
disturbing wishes, ideas or memories into the unconscious, where, although
hidden, they will create anxiety.
2. Displacement:
Transferring
feelings from their true target onto a harmless substitute target. Displacement
is the redirection of an impulse (usually aggression) onto a powerless
substitute target. The target can be a
person or an object that can serve as a symbolic substitute. Someone who feels uncomfortable with their
sexual desire for a real person may substitute a fetish. Someone who is frustrated by his or her
superiors may go home and kick the dog, beat up a family member, or engage in
cross-burnings.
3. Denial:
Failing/refusing
to acknowledge/perceive some aspect of reality. Denial involves blocking
external events from awareness. If some
situation is just too much to handle, the person just refuses to experience
it. As you might imagine, this is a
primitive and dangerous defence - no one disregards reality and gets away with
it for long! It can operate by itself
or, more commonly, in combination with other, more subtle mechanisms that
support it. For example, smokers may
refuse to admit to themselves that smoking is bad for their health.
4. Rationalization:
Finding
an acceptable excuse for some unacceptable behaviour. Rationalization is the
cognitive distortion of "the facts" to make an event or an impulse
less threatening. We do it often enough
on a conscious level when we provide ourselves with excuses. But for many people, with sensitive egos,
making excuses comes so easy that they never are truly aware of it. In other words, many of us are quite prepared
to believe our lies.
5.Reaction–
formation:
Consciously
feeling/thinking the opposite of your true unconscious feelings/ thoughts. This
is a movement back in psychological time when one is faced with stress. When we are troubled or frightened, our
behaviours often become more childish or primitive. A child may begin to suck their thumb again
or wet the bed when they need to spend some time in the hospital. Teenagers may giggle uncontrollably when
introduced into a social situation involving the opposite sex.
6. Sublimation:
A
form of displacement in which a substitute activity is found as a way of
expressing some unacceptable impulse. This is like displacement, but takes
place when we manage to displace our emotions into a constructive rather than
destructive activity. This might for
example be artistic. Many talented
artists and musicians have had unhappy lives and have used the medium of art of
music to express themselves. Sport is
another example of putting our emotions (e.g. aggression) into something
constructive.
For example, fixation at the oral
stage of development may later lead to seeking oral pleasure as an adult
through sucking one’s thumb, pen or cigarette.
Also, fixation during the anal stage may cause a person to sublimate
their desire to handle faeces with an enjoyment of pottery.
7. Identification:
Incorporating/introjecting
another person into one’s own personality – making them part of oneself.
According to Freud’s concept of the Oedipus Complex, a child may experience
feelings of resentment towards their father as they compete for the affection
of their mother and the resulting castration anxiety - an irrational fear
directed towards the father - may lead them to feel the need to appease the
father. In order to pacify a person whom, we perceive to be a threat, we may
emulate aspects of their behaviour. By adopting their mannerisms, repeating
phrases or language patterns that they tend to use and mirroring their
character traits, a person may attempt to appease a person. This defence
mechanism was described by Anna Freud as identification with an aggressor.
8. Projection:
Displacing
your own unacceptable feelings/ characteristics onto someone else. When we
experience feelings or desires that cause anxiety, or that we are unable to act
on owing to the negative impact that they would have on us or those around us, we
may defend the ego from resulting anxieties by projecting those ideas onto
another person. A person who is afraid of crossing a bridge with a friend might
accuse them of having a fear of heights, for example, and in doing so, avoids
accepting their own weaknesses. In the case of Daniel Schreiber, who accused
his therapist of attempting to harm him.
9. Regression:
Reverting
to the behaviour characteristic of an earlier stage of development. This is a
movement back in psychological time when one is faced with stress. When we are troubled or frightened, our
behaviours often become more childish or primitive. A child may begin to suck their thumb again
or wet the bed when they need to spend some time in the hospital. Teenagers may giggle uncontrollably when
introduced into a social situation involving the opposite sex.
10. Isolation:
Separating
contradictory thoughts/feelings into ‘logic thoughts’ compartments. The defence
mechanism of isolation can lead a person to separate ideas or feelings from the
rest of their thoughts. In distinguishing an emotion or impulse from others in
this way, a person attempts to protect the ego from anxieties caused by a
specific situation. For example, a person with a particularly stressful job may
use isolation to separate their work life from their family life, avoiding the
stress affecting their relationships.
Other types of Defence Mechanisms
Since
Freud first described the original defence mechanisms, other researchers have
continued to describe other methods of reducing anxiety. Some of these defence
mechanisms include.
Acting out: The individual copes with stress by engaging in actions
rather than reflecting upon internal feelings. When the id component of the
human psyche signals the desire to act on an impulse, the ego and super ego
will often counteract it if they feel that that behaviour would be
counterproductive or immoral. A person may want to curse after falling over in
a busy street, but the ego, perceiving this as contradicting social etiquette,
will often lead to them holding back on the expletives. On some occasions,
however, we may not be able to balance the impulses of the id and will defend
the ego by simply acting out the irrational desires.
Affiliation: Involves turning to other people for support.
Acceptance of a situation that has been causing anxiety is one technique that
we might use to live with an undesirable circumstances or feelings. For
instance, someone may acknowledge that they have behaved unreasonably towards
their father owing to an Oedipus Complex, or accept their new circumstances
after separating from a partner.
Aim inhibition: The individual accepts a modified form of their
original goal (i.e. becoming a high school basketball coach rather than a professional
athlete.)
Altruism: Satisfying internal needs through helping others. An act
of goodwill towards another person, known as altruistic behaviour, can be used
as a way of diffusing a potentially anxious situation. Altruism may be used as
a defence mechanism, for example, by being particularly helpful to a person who
we feel might dislike us or neutralising an argument with kind words and
positivity.
Introjection: Introjection
occurs when a person takes stimuli in their environment and adopts them as
their own ideas. This may involve internalising criticism from another person
and believing the other person’s points to be valid. A person may introject
religious ideas that they have heard at church, or political opinions that
friends espouse. Behaviour can also be introjected - the mannerisms of a father
may be observed by his son and then replicated.
Humility: Showing humility involves lowering our expectations and
view of our self-importance, sacrificing our pride and often focussing on
others. Humility can enable us to pacify those around us in tense conflicts and
encourage cooperation with other people to take place. For example, someone who
is known to boast about their abilities may show humility whilst trying to
complete a challenging task. This might encourage others to empathise with, and
help, them.
Idealisation: Idealisation involves creating an ideal impression of
a person, place or object by emphasising their positive qualities and
neglecting the those that are negative. Idealisation adjusts the way in which
we perceive the world around us and can lead us to make judgement that support
our idealised concepts. People often idealise their recollections of being on
holiday or memories from childhood, seeing them as ‘happier times’, but fail to
recollect arguments or stresses during those periods. We often idealise the
image we hold of people we admire - relatives, partners or celebrities, making
excuses for their failures and emphasising their more admirable qualities.
Fantasy: When life seems mundane or distressing, people often use
fantasy as a way of escaping reality. They may fantasise about winning the
lottery or idealised outcomes of their lives changing for the better in some
way. Fantasies help us to explore alternatives to situations that we are
unhappy with but unrealistic expectations of them being fulfilled can lead to
us losing touch with reality and taking more viable actions to improve our
lives.
Avoidance: Refusing to deal with or encounter unpleasant objects or
situations. When a perceived situation creates anxiety, one convenient option
is sometimes to avoid it. Although avoidance can provide an escape from a
particular event, it neglects to deal with the cause of the anxiety. For
example, a person might know that they are due to give a stressful presentation
to colleagues at work, and take a sick day in order to avoid giving it.
Avoidance in this situation might be only a short-term option, however, if the
presentation is rescheduled to another day. Someone may also avoid thinking
about something which causes anxiety, preferring to leave it unresolved instead
of confronting it.
Undoing: When we act on an idea or impulse that we later regret, we
may adopt a defines mechanism of attempting to “undo” that action in order to
protect the ego from feelings of guilt or shame. A person may intentionally
push past someone in a shop, but realising that the person was frail, feel
guilty with regards to their behaviour. They may try to undo their action by
apologising or offering to help the person.
Compensation: Overachieving in one area to compensate for failures
in another.
Social Comparison: When people feel that they have been victims of
unjust actions, they may defend the ego by comparing themselves to those worse
off. Similarly, we may see similarities between ourselves and others in a
better position to improve our self-image. These defines mechanisms are known
as download or upward social comparisons. For example, a man who has broken a
leg and confined to a wheelchair may make a downwards social comparison with a
person who has been diagnosed with a more serious condition to make their own
situation seem less troublesome. Alternatively, a person might seek to identify
with a person of a perceived higher social position,
Self-Serving Bias: The self-serving bias arises from our need to
protect the ego from self-criticism and to defend ourselves from the complaints
of others. We show a self-serving bias when we exaggerate the importance of our
own achievements - after passing a test, we might over-estimate the
significance of that particular exam, and take credit for completing it without
acknowledging the role that tutors played in our success. Similarly, when faced
with potential criticism we might deflect blame, apportioning responsibility
for failure to anybody but ourselves. Whilst many of us show signs of this
self-serving bias, it can be an ineffective method of defence as it distorts
our view of reality and our ability to rationalise and interpret events
effectively.
Humour: Pointing out the funny or ironic aspects of a situation.
George Vaillant described the use of humour as a “mature” defines mechanism - a
primarily adaptive technique to help us to cope with tense or stressful
situations. Looking for a funny aspect in an environment in which we lack
control can help us to endure it, and can even be an altruistic act in helping
others to better cope as well.
Passive-aggression: Indirectly expressing anger. Displays of
aggression are considered unsociable and undesirable in many societies, so when
aggressive or violent impulses are experienced, people tend to avoid them as
much as possible. However, the remaining energy driving such aggression may
prove to be more difficult contain, and may manifest in other forms, known as
passive aggression. A passive aggressive person may be uncooperative in
carrying out their duties or other tasks, may deliberately ignore someone when
spoken to and might adopt a negative view of their situation, such as their
job, and of those around them (e.g. colleagues).
Somatization: The somatization defence mechanism occurs when the
internal conflicts between the drives of the id, ego and super ego take on
physical characteristics.
Josef Breuer, a colleague of
Sigmund Freud, observed this in the case of Anna O, who sought help from Breuer
for hysteria. Breuer discovered that Anna’s anxieties had resulted from
traumatic events that had been repressed, but later manifested themselves
physically. For example, she experienced paralysis on one side, which Breuer linked
to a dream in which she felt paralysed whilst trying to fend off a snake from
her bed-bound father.
Splitting: Splitting occurs when the ego attempts to reconcile
multiple aspects or rationales, but resorts to understanding the world in
“black and white” terms. A person who experiences splitting may take an
“either-or” approach when making evaluations of the world around them,
including objects, situations, and people. They tend to view ideas as either
right or wrong, with no middle ground or compromise. Similarly, they may take a
“good versus bad” approach in relationships, admiring one group of people
whilst completely rejecting those who do not live up to their expectations.
Wishful thinking: We all engage in wishful thinking to some extent to
avoid facing undesirable realities. A football fan might deceive themselves
that the ailing team that they support will miraculously turn themselves around
and win all of the future matches of the season. Such wishful thinking enables
the person to avoid disappointment and sadness for as long as possible.
References
1)
Freud, A. (1937). The Ego and the mechanisms of
defense, London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
2)
Freud, S. (1894). The neuro-psychoses of
defence. SE, 3: 41-61.
3)
Freud, S. (1896). Further remarks on the
neuro-psychoses of defence. SE, 3: 157-185.
4)
Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on
psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis. Pp. xi
+ 240.
5)
Paulhus, D. L., Fridhandler, B., & Hayes, S.
(1997). Psychological defense: Contemporary theory and research. In R. Hogan,
J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology
(pp. 543-579). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50023-8
Comments
Post a Comment